m=0
Moderator: Cartographers


 Bruceswar
				Bruceswar
			
































 
		
 lostatlimbo
				lostatlimbo
			













 
		
 lostatlimbo
				lostatlimbo
			













 
		

 Bruceswar
				Bruceswar
			
































 
		
 TaCktiX
				TaCktiX
			















 
		

 Bruceswar
				Bruceswar
			
































 
		

 Bruceswar
				Bruceswar
			
































 
		iancanton wrote:Bruceswar wrote:iancanton wrote:west estonia and islands estonia can be combined usefully, for example, to form a proper continent in the classic sense. islands estonia especially ought to be eliminated as a stand-alone bonus because of its small size and isolated location.
Sorry I missed responding to you. I just want to mention I really happen to like that there is a bunch of bonuses. It leads to many different ways to win this map given different drops.
no worries, bruce. having a 2-region bonus in a corner of the map doesn't lead to many ways to win though. it simply ensures that this is the best part of the map to secure in the early stages and gives a consistent advantage to the one who has a good drop there (like classic oceania). with six 3-region and 4-region bonuses, which is already an extreme number, a tiny 2-region bonus in addition makes no sense at all.


 iancanton
				iancanton
			


















 
		

 Bruceswar
				Bruceswar
			
































 
		

 natty dread
				natty dread
			












 
		natty_dread wrote:Seems feasible to me. A lot of maps have 2, even 1 territory bonuses, and if the bonus is low enough and there's no chance of dropping it, I don't see how having a 2-territory bonus would be a fundamentally bad idea.


 Bruceswar
				Bruceswar
			
































 
		
 TaCktiX
				TaCktiX
			















 
		TaCktiX wrote:I agree with ian's concern. With it being a corner bonus, it'll be a total shoe-in +2 for anyone who decided to focus on that corner. In the early game it'll be hard to hold, but by the mid-game it might very well be the Most Effective Bonus.


 Bruceswar
				Bruceswar
			
































 
		
 TaCktiX
				TaCktiX
			















 
		

 iancanton
				iancanton
			


















 
		
 laughingcavalier
				laughingcavalier
			
























 
		laughingcavalier wrote:Minor point: you have named the island Saaremaa after its capital Kuressaare - is that intentional?


 Bruceswar
				Bruceswar
			
































 
		Bruceswar wrote:laughingcavalier wrote:Minor point: you have named the island Saaremaa after its capital Kuressaare - is that intentional?
Not following you here?

 Victor Sullivan
				Victor Sullivan
			

















 
			iancanton wrote:my previous comments on the undesirability of a 2-region islands bonus still stand, bruce! this is especially because this bonus is in the corner. if u feel that u really must have a 2-region bonus, then split the central latvia bonus, which i see anyone with any sense avoiding, and merge west estonia with islands estonia.
ian.
 isaiah40
				isaiah40
			













 
		isaiah40 wrote: You can split Central Latvia at Cesis/Ogre and call them North/South Central Latvia. You could also switch Jelgava from West Latvia to South Central Latvia. As for the bonus values, both North and South Latvia could be +4, and West Latvia can remain at +4 as it will have the same number of bordering territories.


 thenobodies80
				thenobodies80
			






















 
		

 Bruceswar
				Bruceswar
			
































 
		 ManBungalow
				ManBungalow
			






















 
		 
 
 thenobodies80
				thenobodies80
			






















 
		

 Bruceswar
				Bruceswar
			
































 
		

 natty dread
				natty dread
			












 
		Users browsing this forum: No registered users