
m=0
Moderator: Tournament Directors


 resitnecdan
				resitnecdan
			




 
		 Pedronicus
				Pedronicus
			


















 
		 )? We (Norway 3) beat England3 in a PW and Sweden in a GW. Norway 4 beat Sweden in a PW and Norway 3 in a GW. England3 beat Norway 4 in a GW and are on their way to beating Sweden in a PW. That put's all of ous (except poor Sweden) on 5 points.
 )? We (Norway 3) beat England3 in a PW and Sweden in a GW. Norway 4 beat Sweden in a PW and Norway 3 in a GW. England3 beat Norway 4 in a GW and are on their way to beating Sweden in a PW. That put's all of ous (except poor Sweden) on 5 points.


 niMic
				niMic
			



















 
		
 vermillion
				vermillion
			
 
		Frigidus wrote:but now that it's become relatively popular it's suffered the usual downturn in coolness.

 qeee1
				qeee1
			

 
		 Pedronicus
				Pedronicus
			


















 
		qeee1 wrote:When the games finish it will be decided, but I think we'll have to stick to the rules stated on the rules page. There may be a playoff or something.

 general_maximus
				general_maximus
			Frigidus wrote:but now that it's become relatively popular it's suffered the usual downturn in coolness.

 qeee1
				qeee1
			

 
		general_maximus wrote:qeee1 wrote:When the games finish it will be decided, but I think we'll have to stick to the rules stated on the rules page. There may be a playoff or something.
sure we have to stick to the rules!
that means: send Norway 4 to the second round based on rule 1, 3 and 4.
cant see any reasons to discuss that.

 niMic
				niMic
			



















 
		Frigidus wrote:but now that it's become relatively popular it's suffered the usual downturn in coolness.

 qeee1
				qeee1
			

 
		

 eddymush
				eddymush
			












 
			niMic wrote:general_maximus wrote:qeee1 wrote:When the games finish it will be decided, but I think we'll have to stick to the rules stated on the rules page. There may be a playoff or something.
sure we have to stick to the rules!
that means: send Norway 4 to the second round based on rule 1, 3 and 4.
cant see any reasons to discuss that.
You misunderstand some of the rules it seems. The deal was that all 3 teams would have 5 points, tiebraker #1, all teams would also have killed/lost the same number of players, so that's tiebraker #3. #4 is correct of course, though IMO the WC-hosts made a mistake when they put that ahead of the old "who beat who how?"-scheme.


 general_maximus
				general_maximus
			

 Marvaddin
				Marvaddin
			







 
		Marvaddin wrote:As I understand, in group E, of course both Norway teams will go for the next stage, but then Norway 4 as 1st place in the group, because they took 10 turns in their 2 victories, and Norway 3 took 12 turns. Is this right?
Do we really have to wait until the next WC?can't we do another something like this before then, because I don't know where i'll be in 4 years, but it might not be CC.
Frigidus wrote:but now that it's become relatively popular it's suffered the usual downturn in coolness.

 qeee1
				qeee1
			

 
		Users browsing this forum: No registered users