
m=0
Moderator: Tournament Directors


 Gamefreakguy
				Gamefreakguy
			

























 
		
 xman5151
				xman5151
			





















 
		
 rayofsun
				rayofsun
			



















 
		

 Kingm
				Kingm
			





























 4
4 2
2
		 gochisox2004
				gochisox2004
			














 
		 Yatti
				Yatti
			




















 
		chapcrap wrote:Jippd wrote:alaskanassassin wrote:I'd like to play. Though my score isn't so hot, at least I have till the 30th. So there is no consideration given to peoples 1 v 1 scores or win ratio? Because if this is to find the best 1 v 1 champ shouldn't that be taken into account. Someone may have 3200 and a much higher score than me and they get all that from speed games or winning 8 player games, but that has nothing to do with 1 v 1. Just a question?
This is a good point. You could easily map rank players on the 30th to figure out their 1 v 1 win ratio.
Well, it's just a tiebreaker. The problem with ratio is they could be lying as well. What if they play a bunch of games against bad players? What if I map rank and it includes bot games as well, which can definitely increase the winning precentage pretty easily?
Essentially, I am open to all tiebreakers and if something is more fair than something else, I don't necessarily have a problem using something different than points, but I'm not really sure that we have anything more fair than simply overall points.
#Jippd #alaskanassassin


 phantomzero
				phantomzero
			






















 
		gochisox2004 wrote:in please. do we get a confirmation that we're in?
phantomzero wrote:chapcrap wrote:Jippd wrote:alaskanassassin wrote:I'd like to play. Though my score isn't so hot, at least I have till the 30th. So there is no consideration given to peoples 1 v 1 scores or win ratio? Because if this is to find the best 1 v 1 champ shouldn't that be taken into account. Someone may have 3200 and a much higher score than me and they get all that from speed games or winning 8 player games, but that has nothing to do with 1 v 1. Just a question?
This is a good point. You could easily map rank players on the 30th to figure out their 1 v 1 win ratio.
Well, it's just a tiebreaker. The problem with ratio is they could be lying as well. What if they play a bunch of games against bad players? What if I map rank and it includes bot games as well, which can definitely increase the winning precentage pretty easily?
Essentially, I am open to all tiebreakers and if something is more fair than something else, I don't necessarily have a problem using something different than points, but I'm not really sure that we have anything more fair than simply overall points.
#Jippd #alaskanassassin
This is my issue as well. From the number of people who have signed up I won't be grtting in to this based on rank and didn't hear about this tourny until the qualifiers were full. It is disappointing for someone who has won and organized many 1-1 tournaments to not be able to play. Not sure of any other methods for entry
just wish I could play.
 chapcrap
				chapcrap
			






























 
		
 shoop76
				shoop76
			





























 7
7 11
11 8
8



 7
7 4
4
 
		 georgizhukov
				georgizhukov
			




















 2
2

 
		

 IcePack
				IcePack
			





































 
		

 hiitsmestevie1
				hiitsmestevie1
			

















 
		
 Clanlord Carl
				Clanlord Carl
			


























 3
3

 2
2 
		 chapcrap
				chapcrap
			






























 
		chapcrap wrote:After speaking with bigWham, we've decided to amend the entry process only slightly to allow those players who have won at least five 1v1 tournaments into this automatically. However, if a lot of them sign up, we will only take the top 24 1v1 tournament winners from that group. After that, score will be the tiebreaker.

 alaskanassassin
				alaskanassassin
			



















 
		chapcrap wrote:After speaking with bigWham, we've decided to amend the entry process only slightly to allow those players who have won at least five 1v1 tournaments into this automatically. However, if a lot of them sign up, we will only take the top 24 1v1 tournament winners from that group. After that, score will be the tiebreaker.


 Jippd
				Jippd
			






















 
		
 azak848
				azak848
			


















 
		Jippd wrote:chapcrap wrote:After speaking with bigWham, we've decided to amend the entry process only slightly to allow those players who have won at least five 1v1 tournaments into this automatically. However, if a lot of them sign up, we will only take the top 24 1v1 tournament winners from that group. After that, score will be the tiebreaker.
So what will you do for a player like me who might qualify based on overall score and I have also won at least 5 1 v 1 tournaments. How will you decide my entry method? Just wondering from a logistical standpoint, I'm hoping I will get in one way or another.
Possible solution is to accept entries in this order:
Take those that win from the satellites>Take the top score based entrants>take the remaining applicants that didn't qualify for score and then take the top 24 that have won at least 5 1 v 1 tournaments
 chapcrap
				chapcrap
			






























 
		Return to Super Events/Special Tournaments
Users browsing this forum: No registered users