,
Moderator: Community Team
 GoranZ
				GoranZ
			




















 
		

 betiko
				betiko
			





























 2
2


 2
2
 
		
 muy_thaiguy
				muy_thaiguy
			






 
			 mrswdk
				mrswdk
			












 
		 mrswdk
				mrswdk
			












 
		mrswdk wrote:Countries who are economically and politically powerful but who do not misuse their power to condone mindless and destabilizing military interventions in sovereign states, and would therefore would make a good new Security Council:
China
Germany
India
Brazil
Japan


 betiko
				betiko
			





























 2
2


 2
2
 
		 subtleknifewield
				subtleknifewield
			













 
			subtleknifewield wrote:lol, don't make me laugh


 betiko
				betiko
			





























 2
2


 2
2
 
		betiko wrote:subtleknifewield wrote:lol, don't make me laugh
tickle tickle!
 subtleknifewield
				subtleknifewield
			













 
			mrswdk wrote:Countries who are economically and politically powerful but who do not misuse their power to condone mindless and destabilizing military interventions in sovereign states, and would therefore would make a good new Security Council:
China
Germany
India
Brazil
Japan
 
 

 waauw
				waauw
			





















 
		waauw wrote:mrswdk wrote:Countries who are economically and politically powerful but who do not misuse their power to condone mindless and destabilizing military interventions in sovereign states, and would therefore would make a good new Security Council:
China
Germany
India
Brazil
Japan
Oh, you're right. China annexing Tibet, violating the souvereign waters of its neighbours, and actively supporting a North-Korean tiranny in its seperation from its southern historical compatriotes just to say "f*ck you western world" is not selfish and militaristic abuse at all.


 riskllama
				riskllama
			




























 
		riskllama wrote:waauw wrote:mrswdk wrote:Countries who are economically and politically powerful but who do not misuse their power to condone mindless and destabilizing military interventions in sovereign states, and would therefore would make a good new Security Council:
China
Germany
India
Brazil
Japan
Oh, you're right. China annexing Tibet, violating the souvereign waters of its neighbours, and actively supporting a North-Korean tiranny in its seperation from its southern historical compatriotes just to say "f*ck you western world" is not selfish and militaristic abuse at all.
f*ck off, you fast-posting cunt....

 waauw
				waauw
			





















 
		betiko wrote:all i see there is a bunch of civilian-like people after getting bombed. So is ISIS over now? It's time to praise Putin?
riskllama wrote:Tibet & South China Sea, mrs?

 GoranZ
				GoranZ
			




















 
		 
 Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880

 saxitoxin
				saxitoxin
			











 
			muy_thaiguy wrote:http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/russia-launches-first-air-strikes-in-syria-live-a6673751.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldne ... -live.html
https://twitter.com/search?q=russia+bom ... _src=twsrc^google|twcamp^serp|twgr^search
http://www.vox.com/2015/9/30/9423229/ru ... isis-syria
Yep, good job hitting one of the places that does NOT have ISIS forces and has been actively fighting AGAINST ISIS.

Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880

 saxitoxin
				saxitoxin
			











 
			muy_thaiguy wrote:http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/russia-launches-first-air-strikes-in-syria-live-a6673751.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldne ... -live.html
https://twitter.com/search?q=russia+bom ... _src=twsrc^google|twcamp^serp|twgr^search
http://www.vox.com/2015/9/30/9423229/ru ... isis-syria
Yep, good job hitting one of the places that does NOT have ISIS forces and has been actively fighting AGAINST ISIS.
 GoranZ
				GoranZ
			




















 
		waauw wrote:actively supporting a North-Korean tiranny in its seperation from its southern historical compatriotes just to say "f*ck you western world"
 mrswdk
				mrswdk
			












 
		
 WingCmdr Ginkapo
				WingCmdr Ginkapo
			




 
		WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:I'll think you'll find the Falklands has always been part of our sovereign state.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880

 saxitoxin
				saxitoxin
			











 
			saxitoxin wrote:WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:I'll think you'll find the Falklands has always been part of our sovereign state.
lol
 mrswdk
				mrswdk
			












 
		mrswdk wrote:saxitoxin wrote:WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:I'll think you'll find the Falklands has always been part of our sovereign state.
lol
Hey it let you write a post with only three characters.

 waauw
				waauw
			





















 
		GoranZ wrote:muy_thaiguy wrote:http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/russia-launches-first-air-strikes-in-syria-live-a6673751.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldne ... -live.html
https://twitter.com/search?q=russia+bom ... _src=twsrc^google|twcamp^serp|twgr^search
http://www.vox.com/2015/9/30/9423229/ru ... isis-syria
Yep, good job hitting one of the places that does NOT have ISIS forces and has been actively fighting AGAINST ISIS.
Russians are targeting locations they identify as ISIS locations, I wont be surprised if US didn't classify those locations as ISIS locations, after all US are bombing ISIS for over a year with absolutely no success, and Obama claims it will take 30 years to defeat ISIS.

 muy_thaiguy
				muy_thaiguy
			






 
			mrswdk wrote:The Tibet thing has been done on here several times already. Tibet was brought back into the Chinese state at the invitation of Tibet itself. The current tensions in Tibet are nothing to do with independence, they are to do with cultural freedoms. And blah blah blah. All the other things that armchair commentators don't know and are in no hurry to learn about.
But today we have a relatively new angle of attack! Welcome to the party...waauw wrote:actively supporting a North-Korean tiranny in its seperation from its southern historical compatriotes just to say "f*ck you western world"
You are assuming that China continues to provide aid to North Korea, a nation with whom China openly has an increasingly cold relationship with and whom China has supported sanctions against in recent years, purely to irritate America. Which is ridiculous.
The reason China continues to help North Korea get by, despite North Korea eagerly biting the hand that feeds, is because without China's aid North Korea would completely collapse. This would mean millions of refugees pouring across the border into China's north east, and the US/South Korea undoubtedly swooping in to take control of North Korea, which would put American troops on China's border. Given North Korea's enormous army, it would quite likely mean a huge war on China's border, in a country which has nuclear weapons. It is in order to avoid these things that China continues to provide aid to North Korea.
And in any case, providing North Korea with economic and food aid is not an assault on North Korea's sovereignty. China's respect for others upheld, all hail the new world order \(^0^)/
 subtleknifewield
				subtleknifewield
			













 
			 a6mzero
				a6mzero
			























 2
2 6
6
 
		Users browsing this forum: DirtyDishSoap